| ▲ | fooblaster 2 hours ago | |||||||
Talk about poor duty of care to users... been using him for 20 years and I have to enable it in my vimrc to take effect. So stupid. Why would I want this to be off? Such amazing design... " Enable persistent undo set undofile | ||||||||
| ▲ | layer8 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
It’s somewhat important for privacy reasons that the feature is opt-in. I don’t know if that’s the reason historically, but I wouldn’t want a text editor to persistently store a copy of everything I type without my consent. It’s almost like a keylogger. Making privacy-sensitive features opt-in is a form of duty of care as well, to avert harm from the user. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | oblio 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Emacs and Vim are basically like that. They have very vocal and entrenched users so that practically no defaults can be changed lest the single Amiga user will start a huge uproar. And since they don't really have a BDFL or commercial pressure, they can be super detached even from standards or expectations that appeared 40 years ago. Neovim was basically a reaction to that, for Vim, where they updated defaults to stuff basically every Unix editor since 2005 has. | ||||||||