> That's not been legally established

100% of the rulings agree with me.

The piracy is not in question. It is unarguably copyright violation.

But that's not what anyone means in this context. Training is what everyone means.

> The law is the law, there can't be different law for corporations with billions in backing.

I didn't say otherwise. That's a straw man.

So we agree they have violated copyright at a much larger scale than LibGen, yet they call LibGen "sketchy" for doing the same thing? Absurd, what exactly are we arguing here?

So, which is it? First you said it was fair use, now you’re saying it’s unarguably copyright violation. You can’t have it both ways.