> They use one line and think they've made a great point because one employee called LibGen sketchy.

No, you are using one line from the post to discredit them. The release has more than that and it’s not the only communication they made on this matter nor is there any indication it will be the last, it’s just the current one.

▲

Skyy93 32 minutes ago | parent [-]

They are having it in the subtitle. In general their whole article is about two main points, first the use of stuff from Libgen, second the points of making people jobless. Three of their points are about the jobless thing two about the LibGen.

About LibGen, there might be more discussion - fair. However, the second argument is no real discussion IMO. Why is putting people out of work suddenly a bad thing? Since when do we argue this when talking about automation?

▲

TeMPOraL 27 minutes ago | parent [-]

There is nothing to discuss about LibGen, really. I don't read this as OpenAI employees even believing LibGen is sketchy. They were worried about optics, because LibGen itself is Russian and does look a bit sketchy, and at the time - much like today - it was easy to make it a headline that makes people pattern-match to "troll farms".

(And then Russia invaded Ukraine, turning any association with .ru things into potential corporate suicide.)

Really has nothing to do with LibGen or with OpenAI. It's about people being easy to manipulate into believing bullshit, which is a reasonable worry, and the Authors Guild is trying to do that exact thing OpenAI was worried about.

▲

Skyy93 23 minutes ago | parent [-]

I agree with you, but I acknowledge that some people (not myself) might feel different about copyright.

	▲	TeMPOraL 20 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I acknowledge that, but this part isn't even about copyright! The whole "sketchy russian website" bit resolves entirely about being seen as associated or supporting troll farms and Putin. EDIT: look at it this way: no one is calling Internet Archive "a sketchy US website".