Because it furthers the idea of a rogue agent and places responsibility and blame where it belongs, on the people running the company.

These ideas aren't mutually exclusive. You can blame a person for creating a rogue agent.

There was no rogue agent. That’s the whole point

	▲	theptip 41 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		What label do you prefer for the agent that did something it was not asked to do?
	▲	0xDEAFBEAD 36 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Person: "AI, please make me paperclips." AI: "OK, I've now converted the entire planet into paperclips." Alien observer #1: "Wow, that was a rogue AI!" Alien observer #2: "False. We need to place the blame where it belongs, on the person who requested the paperclips." Ultimately this type of terminology dispute has a tendency to miss the point.

rfgplk an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

LLMs at this point should be treated as fully autonomous, if not sentient beings. And no, no one has "control" over them not even OpenAI.

	▲	uneekname an hour ago \| parent [-]
		I don't care if OpenAI feels like they have control or not. They are responsible for their actions.