Okay. "OpenAI keeps telling its bots to do things they know are illegal and then acting like they're just little guys who can't be held responsible for their obvious negligence".

▲

38 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

qarl an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

> acting like they're just little guys who can't be held responsible

Again - I don't see any evidence that this is the case - outside the anti-AI conspiracy circles.

Or - maybe I'm wrong - do you have any sort of quote like "we aren't responsible"?

▲

plorg 35 minutes ago | parent [-]

I'm not replying to your post below complaining that no one else accepts your framing. What is the important information you think is missing? If it's just "OpenAI didn't explicitly tell them to do straightforwardly illegal things" then you're just quibbling that no one accepts the interpretation that is most beneficial to OpenAI while ignoring both its incentives and history of this kind of behavior" then I'm not really interested in what you're selling.

	▲	qarl 30 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I notice you ignored the question I asked you - which I will assume means: no - you do not have a quote or other direct information indicating that anyone is attempting to shirk responsibility. I have no interest in trying to guess these people's secret internal motivations. I just want to talk about direct evidence. I see none. Please enlighten me if it exists.