Remix.run Logo
▲ toast0 5 hours ago

Deleware law [1] says

> Special meetings of the stockholders may be called by the board of directors or by such person or persons as may be authorized by the certificate of incorporation or by the bylaws.

California law specifically allows for a meeting called by stockholders with 10% of the vote, but for Deleware, a large holder would need authorization in the bylaws. If there was no such provision, a board could plausibly control the company until the next annual meeting, or until court action. Annual meetings can be delayed a bit, but any stockholder can force one once they're a little late.

If you were concerned about the judgement of the CEO/majority holder, and you were optimistic that it was a temporary issue, it might make sense to remove said person for as long as possible; be it a few months or a day and a half.

[1] https://law.justia.com/codes/delaware/title-8/chapter-1/subc...

▲WJW an hour ago | parent [-]

Why would they assume it's a temporary issue though? There's been drama around wordpress for years now, and almost all of it has been around the CEO.

▲jeltz 28 minutes ago | parent [-]

Yeah, that is the main thing which makes to board look bad. Mulleweg has always been a problem and will not stop being so. They should have resigned.