| ▲ | tancop 5 hours ago | |
The whole system is built on the idea that kids will learn because we force them to for their own good. But I don't think you can get real understanding from that, you need internal motivation that comes from a true desire to know more. I'm not saying lower test scores are good but they might be a sign that we need to move from "push based" forced complete education in childhood to a more "pull based" system. That would mean the only mandatory part is basic skills as opposed to knowledge, things like reading and arithmetic but also critical thinking, social skills, task organization and manual/mechanical work. Everything else should be optional, fully up to the student (and their parents until they're 18) and available for their whole lifetime. That's the most important part. If you go to an accounting school and decide to become a plumber after you graduate, then switch to programming at 30 and electrician at 45, you should be able to do that. Low cost, free if you're poor and always without social stigma, the exact same quality and credentials as if you did it in high school. Sometimes you need to wait and experience life a bit before you understand how important your education is. We should support that instead of making it so you only have one real shot. | ||