you have the choice not to purchase burgers from dairy queens, but from macdonalds, or five guys, or wataburger.

You don't have a real choice in an app store on android (except recently, and even then, the alternative stores don't behave well for google-based apps).

That's why it's not a tax when you choose to buy DQ burgers, but a tax when you choose to deploy an app to google app store.

▲

mitxela 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If there's no other burger joint in the small town it's the only place I can get burgers.

I agree Google is using a tax here but the rule you suggested doesn't work

▲

Nevermark 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Your town prohibits you from making your own burger?

Because burger meat is commonly sold in the smallest of grocery stores, and is not technically dependent on what buns, sauces, tomatoes, lettuce … or other ingredients you pair them.

And you can grow your own veggies, and bake your own bread.

It is an entirely componentized market. No gatekeepers.

Even single groceries in tiny towns continue having to compete with larger stores in bigger towns. Because they carry small selections most people make the drive to load up their larder regularly.”

You need to find an example that matches the point you are trying to make.

TLDR: Analysis reveals burger markets are nearly perfect economic opposites of centralized app store markets.

▲

mitxela 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Who is stopping me from strapping a Raspberry Pi to a battery pack? Nobody, that's a componentized market too.

▲

chii 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

but that raspberry pi won't be able to run google apps (or other apps like your bank's) that require play store certification.

	▲	mitxela 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I can't make a DQ burger at home either.

▲

Nevermark 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yes. But what is your point?

This is getting confused. Just find an example that does make your point.

▲

philipallstar 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> You don't have a real choice in an app store on android

You do, and you also can pick iPhone. Or not a smartphone. Or not use apps.

> (except recently, and even then, the alternative stores don't behave well for google-based apps).

Google provides planetscale services like Google Maps for free and you want to build apps that use their services but not pay them 15% for their store, and still complain they don't work perfectly? You seem to be outsourcing a lot to Google but expect to give them nothing in return.

▲

stephenhuey 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Bringing up Google Maps here does nothing for your point because on web or native mobile you pay money to use the API for Google Maps (outside of the store fee). Offering a free version to end users does financially benefit Google.

There are numerous examples of people needing a smartphone to do things in their daily lives. I’ve read compelling stories of people who ran into trouble after ditching their smartphone.

There are lots of parallels to the railroad monopolies. Choice is not as available as you say it is.

▲

philipallstar 5 hours ago | parent [-]

> Offering a free version to end users does financially benefit Google.

How so?

> I’ve read compelling stories of people who ran into trouble after ditching their smartphone.

It'd be helpful if you mentioned them instead of just saying everyone should trust that you were compelled by stories.

▲

4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

close04 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You don’t get Maps “for free”, you pay with your data (your searches, your preferences, etc.). For Google maps is the bait to reel you in, you are the product they sell to their real customers: businesses. Google can shape your preferences by showing you what their paying customers want you to see.

I thought it’s self evident that products like Gmail, Search, Maps and others aren’t free because Google is aiming to do charity but because your personal data allows them to build a digital model of you and charge other businesses for access to that knowledge.

Around me I can’t think of a bank that allows any remote operation without a TAN only available on iOS or Android. That’s the root of a lot of future problems, not the least of which being that the bank charges you more for in person operations.

	▲	philipallstar 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I understand that, but how does that factor into the larger conversation? Are you saying that Google should want to make sure these services should work flawlessly on other stores so we can be tracked by them even if we don't use the Play Store?

▲

saintfire 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Google maps makes money through its API as well as accepting sponsored results to appear before correct results.

I'd agree you have a choice with 3rd party stores but they're working on limiting/killing those tiny markets, already.

▲

mitxela 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Google Maps has its own billing model.

▲

applfanboysbgon 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> and you also can pick iPhone.

"Reee!! It's not a monopoly!!! It's a duopoly!!!!" screeched the pedant.

> Or not a smartphone. Or not use apps.

"Submit to the duopoly or else you're not allowed to develop for the most common consumer computing device on the planet"