Remix.run Logo
▲ delis-thumbs-7e 4 hours ago

Precisely. I don’t really care whether LLM’s can produce code more and better than me. I learn languages, program and study computation to understand better the world we live in. Being a human being means increasingly being technologically augmented. To have any deep understanding of that world requires deep understanding of maths, physics, programming etc. that you can only gather by doing those things and solving problems with your meat brain.

There’s a Twitch-streamer Tsoding who programs on C for fun calling it “recreational coding”. Maybe human programming will be a form of art in the future, virtually useless for big corporations to make money. I don’t care, I love it anyway.

▲throw93038383 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> To have any deep understanding of that world requires deep understanding of maths, physics, programming etc. that you can only gather by doing those things and solving problems with your meat brain.

There is tons of evidence against that. Someone armed with just LLM, can have much better uderstanding of problem then "meat brain expert" who studied the subject for decades.

We seen in last decades how "experts" are clueless, and how they predictions work.

> don’t really care whether LLM’s can produce code more and better than me

So on one side there is monopoly on "deep understanding", but on other no one really cares about quality?

▲delis-thumbs-7e an hour ago | parent [-]

You are both reading too hastily to quite grasp what I am claiming as well as making claims and assumptions you do not back with evidence. If there is tons of evidence how a person with LLM can understand - I was speaking of the world and times we live in, not just single problem - a problem an expert does, it is quite trivial for you to present that evidence.

Mind you,solving a problem is not same as understanding it. Anyone can just take a science calculator and bunch in some function without understanding anything about how to solve it.

▲rienbdj 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Great but you will no longer be paid to do what you love.

▲robotpepi an hour ago | parent | next [-]

History teaches us that understanding deep problems in mathematics finds natural applications elsewhere. So, either AI completely solves mathematics (unlikely for the moment), or we use marginal amount of funding to keep the mathematical communities alive.

▲delis-thumbs-7e an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

I have never been paid to do what I love. Well, I got couple of art grants some years ago.

▲KurSix an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]