| ▲ | olav 4 hours ago |
| Treesheets had this for over 15 years now. https://strlen.com/treesheets/ |
|
| ▲ | drfloyd51 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| But treesheets isn’t used by millions of office workers across the globe. I doubt treesheets is know by 2% of the HN audience. So it just doesn’t make the news. Or was the point you knew an obscure fact about an obscure application? |
| |
| ▲ | seb1204 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Same applies to many of the more elaborate usages of Excel I'd argue. Only few dive deep | |
| ▲ | bulletsvshumans 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I suppose it shows that it's not an outright innovation in this space, for whatever that is worth. |
|
|
| ▲ | qubex 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| And Lotus Improv ‘solved’ spreadsheets about thirty-five years ago. So? |
| |
| ▲ | NuclearPM 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | So? | | |
| ▲ | qubex 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | I guess “so nothing”. The model is fundamentally broken. Adding a third dimension to certain cells by giving them a new type (‘tuple’, ‘list’?) whilst also having multiple sheets that aren’t (really) addressable is a disaster for the semantics. |
|
|