which is why it's so important for people to answer this question.. your views are 100% supported by this project if you leave your expected bias at the door ;)

▲

grey-area 37 minutes ago | parent [-]

I'm curious why you think answering this question and plotting people on a chart based on doom or bloom would help in any way for those who don't think either doom or bloom is an appropriate framing, and I also don't really know what you mean by 'expected bias', expected by whom?

It's not an open question, it's a very closed one which severely restricts the possible futures considered.

	▲	transitivebs 28 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		1. this is just a useful marketing framing. the actual assessment uses a much higher dimensional space to model your worldview in a more meaningful, nuanced way 2. by expected bias, i meant that your answer didn't seem to actually look past the name at the actual content of the project or else you would've realized there are plenty of people modeled on here who share similar views as your own 3. i agree this type of knee-jerk reaction to the name & featured framing is reasonable. always tradeoffs when trying to get an idea to catch hold
	▲	transitivebs 24 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		here's the results of your 2 answers posted into this tool btw. your views are remarkably close to ed zitron's (no judgement; just an observation): https://www.doom-or-bloom.com/public/assessments/8c615299-46...