AI is very efficient when you ask them to do a specific, one-objective task. It has no independence whatsoever, that's why it cannot _replace_ humans. This is evident for anyone using AI routinely.

Of course this doesn't mean we may need less amount of humans for certain jobs, or that I'm the future AI will gain new abilities.

▲

Glemmlko an hour ago | parent | next [-]

It can scale, humans can't.

One human needs to teach one AI system how to do one specific task. Everyone can now use this. Before you had to teach every single human having to do this task and the next generation.

▲

nozzlegear an hour ago | parent [-]

You can easily gather a group of humans and teach them all at once. Humans learn and generalize far more effectively than an AI, we have millions of years of evolution working in our favor here. Will AI match us at this one day? Maybe, but it's certainly not today.

	▲	Glemmlko 32 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Easily? Do you think the global education system is easy? Or efficient? Or cheap? Its not. And the higher education systems around our globe ar neither.

▲

lumost an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

AI has largely not been trained to operate independently yet. Newer products like grok bot/meta muse point in the direction of an asynchronous "virtual worker" type of persona where the AI is empowered to make at least some decisions.