| ▲ | officeplant an hour ago | |||||||||||||
That's the amount of VRAM that has shipped in budget to midtier gpu's since at least 2016 with the RX470/480 from AMD. You can find even older & slower examples from Nvidia and AMD (ex. Nvidia 740GT 4GB edition) Gaming hardware reviewers have been complaining about 4GB of VRAM not being enough since probably 2018 onward. I have a weird setup with two very old 5:4 1280x1024 monitors I like to use for fun, and even playing Subnautica (2018 Release date) I can use up 3.4GB of VRAM at that low of a resolution on High settings. (playing on a single monitor) | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | lucb1e an hour ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||
> That's the amount of VRAM that has shipped in budget to midtier gpu's since at least 2016 In desktops maybe, which will be somewhat popular still among people who play a lot of games but not a majority (IDC has laptop sales at a 3 to 1 ratio to desktops in 2022, but that's not specific to people who play games, much less (2d) Factorio players specifically). The system I bought before my current one was in 2018 and mid-tier then was 2GB. There was no craze for (V)RAM at the time, more a question of which setting you want to play games at (and with which render distance) than whether a given laptop works for games at all As of last month, Steam reports that >15% of their customers still have 4GB VRAM or less: https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/Steam-Hardware-Softw... I'm not familiar with Subnautica beyond the name, is that known for being particularly efficient? edit: meant to say 4GB rather than 2GB in the Steam stats reference, fixed | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||