| ▲ | paulddraper 3 hours ago | |||||||
Were they the same restrictions though? OpenAI just said no surveillance of U.S. persons. Anthropic could have gone further; I think it's likely they did. | ||||||||
| ▲ | burkaman 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
There are three restrictions: > No use of OpenAI technology for mass domestic surveillance. > No use of OpenAI technology to direct autonomous weapons systems. > No use of OpenAI technology for high-stakes automated decisions (e.g. systems such as “social credit”). These are stronger than Anthropic's restrictions (https://www.anthropic.com/news/statement-department-of-war), as OpenAI says themselves: "We think our agreement has more guardrails than any previous agreement for classified AI deployments, including Anthropic’s. [...] Based on what we know, we believe our contract provides better guarantees and more responsible safeguards than earlier agreements, including Anthropic’s original contract." Edit: I was wrong, see my original comment. Sorry. | ||||||||
| ||||||||