| ▲ | mikeyouse a day ago | ||||||||||||||||
For better or worse, Ireland’s extremely lax tax rules resulted in a ton of multinational corporate cash ‘stuck’ there with companies having the option of spending there roughly tax free or repatriating back to the US at some rate higher than that. It also really helps sell the ‘of course an Irish subsidiary owns all of our IP’ tax claims if there is actual spending there, hence you got all the pharma investment and the capital projects from others like Intel and Apple. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | piltdownman a day ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Rather the US lax rules regarding their own enforcement. The Double Irish (& Dutch Sandwich) where Companies routed profits through two Irish-registered subsidiaries, attributing intellectual property royalties to a management seat in a tax haven like Bermuda, is closed since 2015. Subsequent sequential mismatch structures (the "Single Malt" tool) that replaced the Double Irish for certain firms using non-EU residency loops were also banned. Finally there's a 12.5% charge on unrealized capital gains when a company moves its assets or tax residency out of Ireland. The headline tax rate and the effective tax rate are also very different things. France's effective corporate tax rate was actually lower than Irelands - but France is an absolutely brutal place to do business in for employers and they've comparatively no english-language tech FDI to speak of. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | alephnerd a day ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
"Trapped capital" is not why Intel has doubled down on Ireland. It's because whenever Intel asks for anything, the Taoiseach, IDA, and Invest Ireland will move mountains to do it. Ireland is extremely business friendly because their leadership actually listens to industry. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||