Yes. I am broadening the definition of "media" and "publication", maybe, though it is posts on his own publishing platform and performances at his own breakaway conference.

But if someone misrepresents deliberately on a topic of polarising importance, why would you spend any time listening to them on any other topic?

I would (still) listen to him if I did not know he wrote stupid wrong things on other topics in bad faith.

Apparently somewhere between a third to a half of American scientists believe in some kind of god. Not to denegrate those who believe, but that's some kind of compartmentalization going on. Politics isn't any different. I dunno, I guess I don't have much issue listening to people with whom I disagree. Some people just get stuck on things. I do to, and maybe I'm the one that's wrong.