| ▲ | Aeolun 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||
I feel like this is obvious. Eventually dying of all the weird body failures doesn’t inhibit your ability to procreate, but if you cannot survive alcohol or other various poisons you’ll never make it to a fertile age. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | nofunsir 10 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
It's more than possible to make it to adulthood without ingesting a drop of alcohol, even if you're talking about fermented fruit. It's easy, in fact. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | nomel an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Picking the wrong berry from a bush isn't so difficult. Ask me how I know. And, for my second encounter, don't think because you see an animal eating it, it's safe! | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | kypro an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
My guess is that this is half the story. It seems like there would be some advantage to some creatures of not aging, or having individuals who have significant longer life spans. This is common in evolutionary algorithms anyway so it's notable we don't see it in nature, at least not in the form of extended lifespan perhaps measured by average lifetime heart beats. It's easy to imagine a world where nature might want to keep the alpha lion around longer than the others so it can have more offspring, for example. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||