Whenever I hear about this I can't help but be reminded of the Howard Hughes Glomar Explorer, where a hugely-expensive commercial project was actually part of a secret CIA initiative to recover a Soviet submarine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glomar_Explorer

I'm not sure that's truly the case here, but it does seem like the tech Project Suncatcher is working on has at least some overlap with requirements for military SIGINT and in-orbit imagery processing.

▲

motionlessveloc 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Why would the CIA need Google's cover for any of that? The Feds have been flying spy satellites since the 1950s and there's plenty of classified satellite launches.

▲

OkayPhysicist 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Because anybody near-peer to the US at this point has the capability to shoot down satellites, and anything launched on a classified satellite launch is a prime target.

▲

motionlessveloc 7 hours ago | parent [-]

A foreign nation shooting down a US satellite would be an act of war, regardless of whether it's a Google or CIA satellite.

▲

datadrivenangel 6 hours ago | parent [-]

but 'accidentally' bumping it with space debris would be an 'accident'.

▲

jryle70 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Well, then American will "accidentally" shoot down their satellites. Nobody wants any of that.

	▲	fulladder 5 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Be sure to ask your favorite AI assistant about the time the U.S. "accidentally" bombed a Chinese embassy [1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_bombing_of_the_C...

▲

maxlin 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

While a bit tin foil hat-y, this is an interesting (conspiracy) theory, even while space datacenters aren't as impractical as some people try to make them to be.

	▲	senordevnyc 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Some people, or physics?

▲

aaron695 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]