No, I'm saying the word "count" doesn't appear in the quote in the article.

This is the quote from the article:

> > A week later, on August 23, the officers returned and arrested him on suspicion of possessing a firearm

You falsely added "[count]" to the quote and then argued about the count, which isn't in the quote.

Actually, here's what you said and I quoted:

> The article I linked clearly says he was arrested for one count of stalking and another account of suspicion of possession of a firearm: