| ▲ | zactato 10 hours ago | |||||||||||||
I think one of the reasons for putting these in space is to move them beyond the borders of any national control. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | GMoromisato 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
You can't launch from the US without the federal government giving you permission. And SpaceX does not have (nor are they planning) any launch pads outside the US. [And because of ITAR, I'm not even sure they'd be allowed to build one.] However, I do think avoiding local control (state/city permits) is a reason for this. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | edot 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Surely if this were the reason, you'd just put it in international waters? | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tumdum_ 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
What does it matter where physically computers are located? If the owners can be imprisoned in US, the will cooperate with US government. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | echoangle 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
As long as the company has a HQ and owners that care about their quality of life, they don’t really gain any extra safety by moving their hardware to space compared to keeping it where they are based. | ||||||||||||||