| ▲ | egorfine 7 hours ago |
| I genuinely believe that in 2015 Apple had the balls to resist and today they don't. I am judging by a simple fact, that "please confirm your age" screen is now mandatory during the iPhone setup in all countries, and in some it's behind a KYC. I have a strong opinion that this is insane. And once they let the foot in the door - there is no closing it. |
|
| ▲ | hn_submit a few seconds ago | parent | next [-] |
| Apple is surely resisting, but there's a limit to how far they're willing to go. They won't risk losing the entire EU market, for example. Or the Chinese market. The UK is a minor footnote. They can afford to lose it if push came to shove, but for now they're willing to make conciliatory gestures. |
|
| ▲ | microtonal 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Even in 2015 Apple put in backdoors. They have been really good at making people believe things that are not true. E.g. from the linked post: iCloud already protects sensitive categories of data (like Passwords, Health data, Messages in iCloud, etc) with end-to-end encryption by default. Except that there is a footnote in Apple's security document where they confirm that Messages in iCloud is not end-to-end encrypted if you don't enable ADP and have iCloud Backup enabled (which is probably most users): Standard data protection: When iCloud Backup is enabled, the keys to your backups are secured in Apple data centers. If you use both iCloud Backup and Messages in iCloud, your backup includes a copy of the Messages in iCloud encryption key to help you recover your data. https://support.apple.com/en-us/102651 So, there is always a backup of Messages in iCloud accessible to Apple and thus (US?) law enforcement, unless you enable ADP and the people you communicate with also use ADP. WhatsApp is similar by the way. Unless you enable E2E backups, they end up in iCloud/Google Drive backups and are only encrypted at rest. Of the major messengers, I think only Signal completely opts out of iCloud backups and have their own real E2E-encrypted backups. Even most technical people I talk to do not know this and don't have ADP enabled. There are a lot of weak defaults like that. |
| |
| ▲ | kyralis 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | The original implementation of iCloud included Apple's ability to recover the data. You can view this as a backdoor, and that might be fair, but the reality is that it's also a feature in the eyes of many customers - because people will lose devices and passwords, and when Apple doesn't have the keys that means they also lose data. Many customers would rather be able to get their data back. Apple has moved more things into the bucket of "we do not have the keys for this" over time, but pretending that this isn't a tradeoff for the common customer is disingenuous. That's why ADP exists, so that those who want to make a different tradeoff can do so. Commenters on HN tend to be technically savvy and tend to want the defaults to be tailored to a technically savvy customer base. That's fine, but that's not a real representation of all of the smartphone users out there, and in this case Apple is directly offering the choice that they usually get knocked for taking away. |
|
|
| ▲ | briffle 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| They never did. they had the balls to resist against western governments, where it was politically adventagous to do so. They folded to China real quick, because they wanted to make sales. All "icloud storage" in china has been on another storage platform, that follows all the local laws. |
| |
| ▲ | indoordin0saur 3 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Wait... you mean this was all just a marketing and PR ploy? | |
| ▲ | egorfine 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Folding before China in China is not the same as folding before totalitarian western demands. | | |
| ▲ | throwawayffffas 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Why? They only disabled ADP in the UK, how is it different? | | |
| ▲ | unified101 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | It isn't. | | |
| ▲ | Matl 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Except for where Western governments pearl clutch about freedom and how free and open they are unlike big, bad China and all that. | | |
| ▲ | pocksuppet an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Remember that North Koreans genuinely believe they are living in the most free country on earth. | |
| ▲ | philipallstar 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Western governments pearl clutch about freedom and how free and open they are That's not how to use "pearl clutch". And the UK doesn't do that, and it isn't very free or open, except in the deranged mind of Kier Starmer[0]. Classic liberalism in the UK has long given way to regulation of speech, proud conformity, state dependency, and all the other things that are hallmarks of people who treat the state as a surrogate parent. [0] https://uk.news.yahoo.com/starmer-defends-uk-commitment-free... |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | ImJamal 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It is not like their HQ is in China. They chose to enter the Chinese market. | | |
| ▲ | sneak an hour ago | parent [-] | | Every iPhone sold everywhere is manufactured in China. They make 34,000 iOS devices every hour, 24/7. That’s not possible anywhere else. Apple is, from a purely practical standpoint, more a Chinese operation than an American one. | | |
| ▲ | ImJamal an hour ago | parent [-] | | They could manufacture them in China, but not sell the phones there? | | |
| ▲ | sneak 2 minutes ago | parent [-] | | China is their second biggest market, I believe. Additionally, the humans who make all of the iPhones and iPads are Chinese people, subject to Chinese law. Apple has to do exactly what the CCP wants, at least for now. They are desperately trying to ramp up phone production in India, but there is huge expertise at Foxconn that isn’t in India as yet. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | realusername 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The only thing where they tried to push back very hard was the EU's DMA, beyond that they folded quickly to absolutely everything else. | | |
| ▲ | PorciiVorbesc 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | They pushed back on the DMA because that affects the monetisation opportunities of their walled garden ecosystem. Any other invasive privacy/encryption interventions from the government only affects their users, not their money, so they cave without issues. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | SXX 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Apple routinely removes VPNs and other apps from App Store in Russia even though they supposedly left the market in 2022. They obvioualy never ever resisted anything except its a good PR stunt. |
| |
| ▲ | Zenul_Abidin 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Apple doesn't KYC in Russia though We are quickly heading to a world where governments want us to KYC everything, and we saw with the Revolut breach what happens when very, very bad people gain access to our private data. | | |
| ▲ | SXX 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Whole point is that Apple routinely execute government orders from the most repressive regime on earth after North Korea. And from bloodiest one in last two decades. Even though they have zero presence in a country. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | GJim 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > "please confirm your age" screen is now mandatory during the iPhone setup in all countries Not quite. The request to confirm age is there, but actually completing it isn't mandatory (though granted, it does leave an 'alert' thingy on your phone settings saying you haven't finished setting it up). |
| |
| ▲ | EmbarrassedHelp 30 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | It locks down devices like ransomware, permanently restricting functionality of web browsers, messaging apps, and other apps until the user submits to age verification. Its mandatory if you want your device to function normally without restrictions. | |
| ▲ | egorfine 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | There is no "skip" button available. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | someonebaggy 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Is it required to KYC in those countries? I'm generally okay with "how old are you?" without KYC and changeable later. It just allows apps and websites to display age-appropriate content. |
| |
| ▲ | egorfine 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | > I'm generally okay with "how old are you?" It's a foot in the door. Once this question exists, the next logical one is "prove it". | | |
| ▲ | someonebaggy 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Ok but my phone already asks me for my name, isn't that bad too? | | | |
| ▲ | ajsnigrutin 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Same with digital IDs (for example the EU one), where you'll have to install it to provide a "zero knowledge" proof today, and since you already have everything in your phone, it'll be easy to implement the "real name" policy when registering/commenting/etc. | | |
| ▲ | someonebaggy 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | I'm not aware of any EU project to make a smartphone literally mandatory (instead of just convenient). If they do, I'll buy a separate smartphone just to hold my ID. | | |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | benatkin 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I doubt that with the speed of thought dramatically increasing due to AI, that the door will stay closed just because it's being closed now. That decision will be revisited. |
|
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [deleted] |