| ▲ | r_lee 8 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
from my memory, the OS on Nokias was just fine. it was great. it just wasn't a smartphone OS which makes sense because they had these half button half touchscreen hybrid phones the internet browsing features were something akin to like paid phone numbers which you'd avoid using because it was like special stuff it wasn't first class in any way, it was perpetually stuck in the past. and as you can see, their entire business model was based on iterating on the same thing in a million ways, so there's no way they were gonna do something from the ground up to focus on a first class experience for one form factor which could support 3rd party developers etc. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | fidotron 8 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> from my memory, the OS on Nokias was just fine. it was great. it just wasn't a smartphone OS Nokia had at least three tiers of OS: Series 30, Series 40 (which had subseries) and Series 60. It was S60 which was the smartphone Symbian based one which is where they went especially nuts. S40 was actually really good and solid, and if someone remembers the UI of a Nokia fondly it's almost certainly a S30 or S40 device. A bit basic, but for a feature phone of that era it was great. The reason SonyEricsson started gaining market share was their phones were more like improved S40 devices (like higher fidelity UIs) than Nokia's S60 lines which were . . . not. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||