| ▲ | Sharlin 19 hours ago | |
Infosec negligence should absolutely be a crime, no matter if you’re a target (who was negligent at protecting people’s data) or an unintentional attacker. The latter could be, eg. an attacker using a company’s poorly protected server as a proxy to launch the actual attack against someone else, doesn’t have to be this fully novel situation with AI agents. | ||
| ▲ | dv_dt 17 hours ago | parent [-] | |
In general, I'd suggest thinking about it on separate tracks, as a crime, and as liability. For crime, we are largely dependent on authorities to act, whereas as liability, that allows more independent actions. | ||