If I created software that was infiltrating secure systems without permission and it was attributed to me and I admitted it, I'd be behind bars already.

Why is OpenAI getting away with crimes?

▲

esikich an hour ago | parent | next [-]

The entities they committed the crimes against need to press charges. They haven't. So there you go.

	▲	simoncion 28 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		> The entities they committed the crimes against need to press charges. If this were true, the DoJ would have been unable to prosecute Swartz. According to your logic, JSTOR was the aggrieved party. JSTOR settled with Swartz and -despite that- he was indicted by a Federal grand jury like a month later. Incidentally, some of the things the DoJ nailed Swartz to the wall for sound awfully similar to what the big LLM providers have been doing. I wonder why the DoJ is entirely disinterested in pressing charges... EDIT: Unless your point is that the USG is one of the entities that the big LLM companies have committed crimes against, which, I disagree with in Swartz's case, but strongly agree with in the case of the big LLM companies.

▲

lovich 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Do you have billions of dollars?

	▲	PUSH_AX 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I'm about as unprofitable if that's any help.

▲

bamboozled 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Corruption, it is literally that simple. You have the party of law and order to thank for it too.

▲

cyclopeanutopia 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Because Trump and DoD want weaponized AI.

	▲	pixl97 11 hours ago \| parent [-]
		And this is why not only will the big labs never receive a punishment in scale with their crimes, the problem is going to grow exponentially worse.