| ▲ | FLAWED's Flaws and What This Means for Industry Research(suhacker.ai) | |
| 19 points by tob_scott_a 4 hours ago | 3 comments | ||
| ▲ | unprovable 2 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
> A paper is not a blog post True words. This post is actually a very good enumeration of the status quo for this debacle. | ||
| ▲ | tolugenius 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
> If you believe these issues should not be raised because FLAWED was critical of OpenAI, please know that research is not sports. OpenAI is not the Spurs, 1Password is not the Knicks, and Off-by-1 Labs is not Jalen Brunson. Got a hearty laugh out of this. | ||
| ▲ | Qwuke 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
The "peer review" comment in the original seems particularly bizarre given the errors https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review | ||