Remix.run Logo
▲ Scientists build most accurate atomic clock(phys.org)
12 points by wglb 2 days ago | 3 comments
▲chicken-stew an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Somewhat off-topic:

I’ve often wondered if a hobby-class atomic clock can be built with “a less accurate gas” that is easy to excite and measure in a feedback loop simply because it’s available in a handy package that lends itself for experimentation without having to mess with melting glass and bottles of pressurised gas. E.g. neon, nitrogen or mercury vapour.

The reason I’m asking is because in RF we often need a stable reference, and these come in a clear $ for phase noise relationship: RC, LC, xtal, TCXO, GPSDO, YIG, Rubidium, …

Price-wise, all atomic clocks come after Rubidium. But would it be possible to build an atomic clock that sits between TCXO and Rb both for price and phase noise, by employing a non-exotic gas in a readily available lamp?

▲ahazred8ta 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Lutetium-176, element 71, better than 1 part in 10^18.

▲wglb 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Article in Nature https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-11072-8