Remix.run Logo
mrshadowgoose 5 hours ago

"lighter" is the revolutionary bit.

A huge impediment to VR uptake is having to go through the process of strapping a brick to one's face.

This isn't quite the "just putting on a pair of glasses" experience, but it's much closer to that than the former.

steve_taylor 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Its lighter form factor is more evolutionary than revolutionary. The AVP has some unnecessary extras such as the outward-facing display. If Apple wanted, it could make an Apple Vision Air with the latest A-series chip, a much lighter form factor and a much lower price - just like Meta VR Glasses.

Groxx 2 hours ago | parent [-]

More compact lenses are a constant improvement, but one of the main things here is just moving compute and power off of your head. Which many have done before.

Honestly I don't know why that's not more common. I've used puck-based ones, they're great - far less heat and mass on your face is a major benefit. They're also usually easier to plan upgrades for, as the two most costly pieces (which do very different things and have very different progress cycles) are separated.