Remix.run Logo
upupupandaway 6 hours ago

Asking earnestly: is ArXiv a valuable resource? I used it few years back when finishing my (late) Master's, but also saw a lot of crap published there (primarily for promotion/visa purposes) so it kind of took the shine out of the service for me.

txhwind 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

A free-to-read PDF host site is valuable enough. Most academic publishers have a pay wall.

tristanj 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The preprint papers on arXiv are like 99% the same as the published versions, except they're free instead of locked behind a multi-thousand dollar/year paywall.

upbeat_general 4 hours ago | parent [-]

And if there are differences, that is often a good thing! It can mean the author wanted to format something in a particular way that the journal didn't allow.

senderista 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Often they are extended versions of the journal articles and contain valuable material that had to be cut for space limits.

edot 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It’s good for getting free access to preprints which are often close enough to the paywalled real papers in journals. If I find a paper I want (or more realistically, if ChatGPT finds a paper it wants for me), but it’s behind a paywall, odds are the authors put a preprint on arXiv.

ufo 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Some researchers and journals publish peer-reviewed work on arxiv; it serves as a stable archive that won't be plagued by link rot or paywalls.

embedding-shape 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Either you setup feeds for the specific topics/subjects you care about, scan what you come across once a week, or you use it to get access to papers that are usually behind some paywall. I don't think the intention nor the value comes from just haphazardously reading through everything in some section.

It's not peer-reviewed and supposed to free and accessible from both sides so the results kind of makes sense.