| ▲ | robomartin 2 hours ago | |
> services like door-dash are literally built on a concept of a sucker pays more Strongly disagree with your entire narrative, one that it demonstrably disconnected from reality. Nobody is forcing anyone --at all-- to use these services. Not one person. Not one company. Not a single law or mandate. If I want to use it and you don't, that's perfectly fine. If I, for whatever reason, want to pay a premium and you think it's stupid, that's fine too. Don't use it. I will. Simple as that. What's the opposite of that? Obamacare. Mandated and forced on everyone. It's shit. It's three times the cost of the insurance we were all promised we could keep if we wanted to (and we could not, because Obamacare killed those plans). Etc. See the difference there? | ||
| ▲ | rootusrootus 30 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
> Obamacare. Mandated and forced on everyone. It's shit. It's three times the cost of the insurance we were all promised we could keep if we wanted to In a sense, I agree with this assessment, and I think it should be corrected. We should allow people to have the older, less expensive plans with their lifetime caps and preexisting condition exclusion. We'd need to work out the details on whether or not we would allow someone choosing those plans from coming back to the ACA plans in the future, though. Maybe for the right price it could work out. Definitely adds complexity, however. | ||
| ▲ | moate an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
If you think "high earners with company subsidized plans"(where I assume you fall based on the general demographics of this site, but correct me if I'm wrong) were the target audience of the ACA, you're right to be pissed. It was for the un/underinsured, and people with preexisting conditions. But your comparison is wrong, because you can...elect to not use the service. You could pay less for less coverage (so like, buying food without paying for a delivery fee because you don't need the convenience). Also, the individual mandate was killed (sucking funding out of the whole program), so you could opt out of the service entirely. Nobody is forcing you to have insurance (at a federal level). See the difference there? | ||
| ▲ | someonebaggy 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Sounds like you agree that suckers pay more. | ||
| ▲ | mandeepj an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> Mandated and forced on everyone. Nope. It's a marketplace. Your above argument is perfectly applicable to it as well. | ||