I believe burning coal realease far more Uranium and radioactive material than nuclear ever did. Listing the plane crashes over the last century wont buldge the statistics of the safety of this mean of transportation.

▲

lukan 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Did I imply anywhere anyhow that I am a fan of coal?

I just don't think it is a good idea to replace something dirty with something else dirty that is indeed quite safe if all goes well, but is horrible if something goes wrong.

Italy has lot's of sun and wind (and geothermal potential).

▲

EA-3167 an hour ago | parent [-]

Everything is a comparison to what exists, not your dreams. The alternative to coal today isn't just renewables, and thinking in those absolute terms is in large part what's handed the fossil fuel lobby decades of default victories.

We don't have time for perfect solution, do all of what you said AND THEN ALSO MORE.

	▲	lukan 7 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		"We don't have time for perfect solution" Exactly. You can buy and deploy solar, wind and batteries as much as you want now. If you care about strategic independence, build factories for them. But a nuclear reactor takes a long time to get build. And is likely way more expensive. If italy manages to do it fast and cheap - other countries will follow, but I believe it when I see it.