| ▲ | jackb4040 4 hours ago |
| If it requires humans in the loop it throws cold water on the hopes of replacing millions of jobs, which is priced into their current valuation. |
|
| ▲ | azan_ 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| It's not, if it was their valuation would be much, much bigger. |
|
| ▲ | Windchaser 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| eh, farming still requires humans in the loop, only <1% of the number that it used to |
| |
| ▲ | jackb4040 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | OpenAI/Anthropic have never pitched themselves as a replacement for farmers. They do explicitly say that they're going to cause significant job loss in knowledge work sectors all the time. | | |
| ▲ | Windchaser 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Right - I'm saying that you can greatly improve productivity / reduce employment while still having humans in the loop. We've already seen it happen with farming, from 1900 -> present. | | | |
| ▲ | cannonpalms 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Woosh. |
|
|
