Remix.run Logo
bigfudge 3 hours ago

Not Op but there’s a inch of people asking why, and I have a similar feeling to op so here’s my post hoc justification for a weakly held and poorly supported prejudice:

It’s really because statistically, in my experience people without kids are more selfish than those without. This is more in description than judgement, but it’s true in my experience. We can speculate as to reasons, but looking after kids does train a certain kind of selflessness. Agreed we might be doing it for ultimately selfish reasons (self presentational or for care in old age or whatever). But for a good chunk of the time, caring for kids seems to require the fairly consistent subjugation of personal preferences, and a degeee of perspective taking, that I just think people without kids don’t have. And that often shows in their interactions at work and in daily life. Obviously there are myriad exceptions. But it’s true enough in my experience.

The wanting to live forever part also seems weird to me, and correlated with a certain sort of self regarding perspective. It seems obvious to me that I (or my generations) need to die for my children and grandchildren to have a good life. To try and subvert that also seems selfish or self important somehow.

I’m not really arguing this is a correct or good or just position. It might be terrible! But it did resonate..

BeetleB 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> It’s really because statistically, in my experience people without kids are more selfish than those without.

I've witnessed the opposite: Having kids made people much more selfish. Resources were plenty before they had kids, so they would spend a lot (time and money) on others - be it friends or the general public.

When kids come along, two things happen:

1. Resources are limited, so a lot less goes outside the family.

2. At least one parent will put the foot down when being generous to people outside the family - even if the wealth/income supports being able to do so. Tribalism sets in.

phainopepla2 an hour ago | parent [-]

Selfishness is commonly understood as putting one's own interest above everyone else's to an excessive degree, not the interest of their family. If you redefine it to include family interests then I think everyone would agree that having a family makes people more selfish, often dramatically so.

I just object to the redefinition.

BeetleB 19 minutes ago | parent [-]

I think this "redefinition" is apt in the context of the conversation. It's about people mistrusting those without kids because they are viewed as selfish, and I'm pointing out that they're often the least selfish, and more likely to "help the world" in situations where they do not benefit.

orangecat 24 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The wanting to live forever part also seems weird to me

Wanting to die after a handful of decades seems weird to me, especially if you're in good health.

It seems obvious to me that I (or my generations) need to die for my children and grandchildren to have a good life

That is very much not obvious.

rtsil 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Paying full taxes to support a society where people with kids pay less taxes and receive more benefits from the State is certainly not selfish. That's the case in my country, at least.

charcircuit 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Money is not the only way one can contribute to one's society. Doubling the amount of productive people to society is also a big contribution.

Even from a purely financial perspective you need to count all of the future taxes that will be collected from the family lineage instead of just from the one person who ended his lineage.

AbsurdCensor 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> It’s really because statistically, in my experience people without kids are more selfish than those without.

That would certainly be your opinion. I think the ultimate selflessness in a world being more and more damaged by humans would to elect not to perpetuate the species, and help try to leave the world a better place for those who do choose to have kids.

anthonypasq 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

very very bizarre ideology. Glad you arent having kids. thank you for your service.

mik1998 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's an absurdly selfish position. You're taking a stance that not existing is superior to living in the future, all the while living in the world yourself. Might as well advocate for nuclear genocide.

tuesdaynight 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Why selfish? They said that they want to leave the world a better place for other people children. Is there something that I didn't get as an ESL?

muspimerol 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The flaw in that ideology is that everyone relies on the next generation for care in their old age. Taking advantage of the future generation without contributing to raising it isn't selfless in the slightest.

If you live in a developed country you probably already have a demographic crisis. Not having kids is hurting the next generation, not helping.

hlynurd 2 hours ago | parent [-]

It still baffles me that some have children to have someone around them when they're old

cannonpalms 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This aligns with my own experience to a T.

sebzim4500 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>in my experience people without kids are more selfish than those without

This goes so far against my own (equally anecdotal) experience that one of us must be living in a bubble

3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
asdff 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>It’s really because statistically, in my experience

Uhh, no. Your experience is not data.