Remix.run Logo
WarmWash 4 hours ago

It would also return tech to something only the wealthy can afford, and the poor get scraps.

The advertising model is socialist utopian business model, where everyone gets the same service, for the same cost, with money being no barrier to entry. Kids in Indian slums are watching the same Youtube as Moms watching 105" OLED TVs in the Hampton's. Hell that mom might even be watching that kids video, which Google happily hosts and promotes for them. All for the cost of being shown detergent and car ads.

People take the internet for granted, and treat ads as some invasive species commandeered by mega corps to extract money from the communal nature of the modern web.

The alternative though is not the current internet sans ads, the alternative is paywalls on everything, and only the rich kid having a Google, Meta, Discord, and Reddit account.

Ads suck, but at least make an effort to see the whole picture.

flufluflufluffy 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Nothing that person said was about removing ads.

WarmWash 3 hours ago | parent [-]

The value of non-targeted ads isn't high enough to support what people are accustomed to getting for free.

izacus 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Non-targeted ads have supported full industries for centuries. Cut the bullcrap.

itsboring an hour ago | parent [-]

Agreed. Traditional TV and radio ads target demographics, not individuals.

jollyllama 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

There's plenty of other laws that limit the choices of the poor for their own good. You can't just build a lean-to slum, you can't buy swill milk.