> until violating the said constitution actually has enforceable consequences it’s not more than a paper tiger. [...] Take for instance the 2nd amendment.

That seems like an exceptionally tepid constitutional violation to pick, after the last several years of massively-worse and flagrant violations.

Are you offering it because you think it represents something typical, and current events will prove to be an extreme outlier?

Honestly it is the one that came to mind as I am apparently a victim of fraud.

More seriously though what good is a constitution if it can be violated without repercussions?

You and I do agree on one thing though but I would adjust that to being the last 40 years rather than just several.