>Violent threats only sound like a good idea if you can only imagine them being used by people you agree with.

You mean like how they used the "you can't speak on an issue because we've decided we're not talking about that" rule to have this lady hauled off?

▲

gruez an hour ago | parent [-]

>You mean like how they used the "you can't speak on an issue because we've decided we're not talking about that" rule to have this lady hauled off?

It's not open Q&A. There's nothing preventing them from speaking on their preferred issue online, or even outside. Otherwise public meetings quickly devolve into anarchy. If a specific time was allocated to talk about speed limits, do you think it's fair game for TERFs to use that time to complain about gendered bathrooms?

That's not to say the mayor/council is in the right either, but we also can't have "if you think the debate was shut down too early you can do whatever you want".

	▲	cucumber3732842 10 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		>It's not open Q&A. There's nothing preventing them from speaking on their preferred issue online, or even outside. Otherwise public meetings quickly devolve into anarchy. If a specific time was allocated to talk about speed limits, do you think it's fair game for TERFs to use that time to complain about gendered bathrooms? Bring on the TERFs. Better it be a dumpster fire that get's DOS'd from time to time than people not be allowed to speak their minds.