Remix.run Logo
Manuel_D an hour ago

That doesn't make make it permissible to try and use the comments periods on other meetings to talk about Flock. The point remains, she was not removed for simply voicing opposition to Flock cameras. The was arrested and removed for trying to derail an unrelated meeting.

Someone going on the stand to rant about abortion during a meeting on sidewalk codes would similarly get removed.

text0404 an hour ago | parent [-]

The person saying your comment is ignorant probably doesn't care about the procedural rules. Instead, it's because you're placing disproportionate emphasis on citizens following meeting rules instead of being concerned that they're denied the ability to speak about policies that directly affect them in a democracy.

Manuel_D 36 minutes ago | parent [-]

But they're not being denied the ability to speak. Heider can go hold a protest against Flock in public.

She's only being denied the ability to speak in the very specific circumstance of a public comment period on sidewalk codes.