No, we do not. Throwing a tantrum is not conducive. If you actually cared about preventing the proliferation of flock cameras, you would hate this woman's actions. No solid arguments, no discussions, just making the opposition look like fools who just have rage and are using this case to feel important.

> No solid arguments, no discussions

From the article, she showed up to make solid arguments and have a discussion, but:

"There was a resolution before the council that would trigger a review of the controversial camera systems, but Schrag moved to send the resolution to committee and prevent public comment on the issue."

I care about preventing the proliferation of flock cameras (and more) and I do not hate this woman's actions even one bit.