| ▲ | theturtletalks 2 hours ago | |||||||
Why is Pi not in the benchmarks? Deepseek beats Strands and its built on Pi so that’s all I needed to know. | ||||||||
| ▲ | cobolcomesback an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Base Pi doesn’t seem like an apt comparison here. Strands comes with MCP servers, subagents, and web fetch tools built in. To get those on Pi, you have to add addons, and then you get into the space of “which addons should be added to make it an apples-to-apples comparison? Which MCP addon do I use, the fastest one, or the most popular one?”. My guess is they chose OMP because it’s the defacto standard for answering those “which addons should be considered out of the box” questions for Pi. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | leodavi 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Deepseek harness is not actually built on Pi harness. It's an independent project. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | techscruggs 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Deepseek was cheaper, but also less accurate. "Beats" isn't a fair assessment. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | jsw97 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Came here to say this. They have oh-my-pi in the benchmark but not pi, but those are very different animals. pi is lightweight out of the box so has very little start-time overhead. (And will not spin up agents like crazy.) pi might do worse if those things are actually important for solving the problem, but it certainly has a shot at being most efficient. | ||||||||
| ||||||||