| ▲ | mrdependable an hour ago |
| This is really looking at the problem from the wrong angle. It’s not that we don’t need all those degrees. The problem is that tech companies are making so much money that it makes other industries practically irrelevant when it comes to return on investment. It has thrown the economy completely off balance. |
|
| ▲ | jordanb an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| I was talking to the turbine engineer at lunch one day and the way he put it is this: There are about five companies who hire people with his background. They all go through boom and bust cycles together. When he graduated they were in a bust cycle and nobody was hiring new graduates, so he found a job in software. He was glad because the pay and working conditions are better, and at the time (a few years ago) it seemed like software engineering was a safe career with lots of employers, which turbine engineering was not. |
|
| ▲ | pocksuppet 30 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_disease |
| |
|
| ▲ | deepfriedchokes an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Strongly agree. Perhaps an economy shouldn’t be organized around money. |
| |
| ▲ | ericmay an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | How would you propose an economy not be organized around money? Any examples you could think of that have worked well? I would also ask that in doing so if you can consider how these changes would work with today's nation states and the scale of 8 billion people or so too. | | |
| ▲ | silverFork 25 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | What will happen is not about what people prefer to happen or not. China grew rapidly too and the west is fearful of their success and that is why Americans are ramping up their Ai and drones and all that believing that spending money will deliver supremacy. There are/were many paths to success traditionally speaking and somethings will work and somethings wont. It is not a decision based phenomena. Its an outcome based on zillions of variables. Whether money will win or not and that everyone will benefit via AI is matter of conjecture.. Who knows.. Place your bets!! | |
| ▲ | dragontamer 20 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Let's start with the basics. Let's ban unlimited money from politics first (ban SuperPacs and return to 90s era political rules). If rich people want to influence politicians, there should be hard caps on money and advertising. There's nothing wrong in saying too much money is now destroying too much of the good parts of our country. Starting one step at a time is better than trying to build a massive reform that goes no where. Once money in politics calms down, the next steps should become more obvious as the noise from the Billionaires no longer drown out our attention. | |
| ▲ | jvanderbot 39 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | I find answers to this question meet idealogical hand waving more than concrete action plans or examples of success. YMMV |
| |
| ▲ | ambicapter 28 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Perhaps you meant "financialization" instead of "money", b/c money is literally what makes up an economy. |
|
