| ▲ | esafak 2 hours ago |
| I would not have said that. I would have asked for the details and tried to find the gaps because, almost always, something could have been done. Then the question is how much risk reduction are you willing to pay for. |
|
| ▲ | jpcosta 2 hours ago | parent [-] |
| Isn't that the same with just more steps? Seems the svp was focusing on what they will do differently next time |
| |
| ▲ | esafak an hour ago | parent [-] | | Presumably the SVP joined the meeting because the incident was significant. The team can present the options but the executive may need to make a judgement call, and he can't do that responsibly if turns his brain off. For instance, what if it happened due to things falling in the cracks between teams, possibly indicating poor org design, or to understaffing? Such things are the responsibility of management. |
|