I am in no way trying to sell Jev here as some panacea of the modern world; I'm only responding to your questions:

> But their example is classification but that would also be possible and faster with a classic BERT model.

With BERT, you need a large, labeled dataset, and you have to train/fine-tune the model. Jev is pitched as a zero- or 'few-shot' model. You define the schema in code, give it instructions, and it works without a traditional training pipeline.

> So their pitch is a task specific smaller model or am I completely misunderstanding the whole thing?

Yup; that about sums it up: it is more or less an optimized, task-specific small model with the flexible understanding of a traditional LLM.

▲

0x445442 6 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

If something is task-specific (well understood) wouldn't this be a good candidate for a computer program?

▲

prometheus1992 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

couldn't be more wrong - there are so many zero shot classifiers available on HF which do the same thing.

▲

garciasn 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I think you're possibly arguing a point I wasn't making? I'm not saying Jev invented zero-shot classification, or that there aren't already zero-shot classifiers on HF that can do classification without fine-tuning; I was responding to questions asked in a silo.

▲

cochne an hour ago | parent [-]

>With BERT, you need a large, labeled dataset, and you have to train/fine-tune the model.

I think they were responding to this. You can use BERT to provide zero shot classification predictions.

	▲	garciasn an hour ago \| parent [-]
		I guess I assumed they meant BERT, not some specific BERT-base model. Vanilla BERT does not support zero shot.