Remix.run Logo
Remix clone Hacker News
new | show | ask | jobsGithub
▲ Dylan16807 a day ago

Your original comment sure didn't do that. It just gave an incorrect answer.

▲mathisfun123 a day ago | parent [-]

What exactly was "incorrect" about it? He asked for a purpose and a use-case not an explanation.

▲Dylan16807 a day ago | parent [-]

> not an explanation

Wrong.

▲mathisfun123 a day ago | parent [-]

.... It's literally right there:

> I'm still clueless on what the purpose and use-case is for ReBAR

Are you seriously debating this?

▲Dylan16807 19 hours ago | parent [-]

They wanted a basic explanation in response to that.

Or to put it differently, I would take the sentence "He asked for a purpose and a use-case not an explanation." and replace the word "not" with a comma.

▲mathisfun123 19 hours ago | parent [-]

I quoted the direct response. I have no idea what you're debating.

▲Dylan16807 17 hours ago | parent [-]

I'm not sure how to put it simpler.

I agree with "He asked for a purpose and a use-case". (This is what your quote supports.)

I disagree with "not an explanation".

When asking for a purpose and use case, they were asking for an explanation.