| ▲ | seltzered_ 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
When you read lines like "California’s extensive network of canals and aqueducts is the lifeblood of the state, providing clean water to populous cities and expansive farms that wouldn’t otherwise have it." you have to ask how we ended up with these canal systems, what the tradeoffs are in a landscape setup this way rather than one where water infiltrates the ground and stays hydrated, and who owns water rights in California. Build Soil has some interesting threads on this: - https://bsky.app/profile/buildsoil.bsky.social/post/3lmeddjd... - https://bsky.app/profile/buildsoil.bsky.social/post/3mkzybkk... (note: I'm not trying to totally bash the solar panel project nor some of the key figures involved who've done great work like Dustin Mulvaney, but do think we should think about how we ended up here) | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | downrightmike an hour ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Back when they thought they could pay their way out of problems. Looking at you florida everglades | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | whalesalad 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I thought this was a pretty awesome video to provide the lore on how water got to Southern California. Growing up in Pasadena I heard the name Mulholland and Eaton (as in canyon) all the time but never realized they were so instrumental in the founding of the city and all the wild shenanigans that went into getting the water from up north to LA. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||