Do you think this is a consequence of the seemingly quarterly RIFs at Oracle? Is it that offshoring wasn’t such a good idea?

▲

lenerdenator a day ago | parent [-]

The irony, of course, is that this will likely have a negative impact upon Oracle's reputation, which will have a negative impact upon its value, which will then be resolved with more RIFs.

It's okay. Larry got another island.

▲

jandrese a day ago | parent | next [-]

At this point if Oracle's reputation has any more negative impact it is liable to roll over and suddenly have an amazing reputation.

▲

dylan604 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> have a negative impact upon Oracle's reputation

Do they have any positive reputation left, or is it just more negative from the previous negative position?

▲

jmclnx a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I doubt it, look at all other breaches over the years.

If anything Oracle will "contribute" a lot to congress people's midterm reelection and in a few months all will be forgotten and Oracle will get more Gov. contracts.

	▲	toyg a day ago \| parent [-]
		I mean, the whole business basically started in order to get government contracts. Not even IBM can boast that.

▲

Tangurena2 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

So. The beatings will continue until morale/profitability improves?

	▲	lenerdenator 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> implying that morale mattered in the first place at Oracle