Why do you want machines to replace human intelligence and ability? I find that dystopian. AI could have meant Augmented Intelligence (which was proposed a long time ago), not let's see when we can replace all human activity.

One is humanist, the other is anti-human, (in the end goal at least).

▲

krisoft a day ago | parent | next [-]

> Why do you want machines to replace human intelligence and ability?

Where do you see the commenter say this?

▲

goatlover a day ago | parent [-]

> There will hopefully (?) come a time one day when human beings provide only ultimate value judgments, and everything else is done by machines.

In their previous grandparent post. They do reserve a place for human value judgement, but I doubt even that remains if everything else has been automated. The machines will decide what we value. We already see that to some degree with algorithmic engagement and targeted advertisements.

	▲	serbuvlad 18 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The (?) is meant to express doubt that it is a good thing on net. But regardless of whether it is, it is what is likely to happen, and there will certainly be some good things that come out of it.

▲

dyauspitr 20 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Seems like machines being able to replace human intelligence and ability will be a dystopia in the short term, but it’s the only route to a long-term utopia.