| ▲ | woah a day ago |
| Jev's bet is that if it works well enough for random use cases that nobody complains, then management won't feel a need to develop a benchmark/eval, and they won't need to employ all those data science guys. |
|
| ▲ | momojo a day ago | parent [-] |
| I'd also add that they're hoping Jevon's Paradox also leads to a whole new segment of users who would have never reached for a classifier in the first place, given the barrier to entry. |
| |
| ▲ | sanderjd a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Yes this is what I'm interested in. I think they might be right. I'm already finding myself thinking "well maybe a classifier would be useful here now that it's so easy to do...". This probably just means that I could have been reaching for that tool more often already. But in practice I wasn't, and this has opened my eyes to the potential opportunities there. | |
| ▲ | woah a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | And if you do get complaints or feedback on the classification, have a dev log into the user's account, tweak the Jev prompt a little until the issue goes away, and push it to production | | |
| ▲ | what a day ago | parent [-] | | > tweak the Jev prompt a little until the issue goes away But makes issues for someone (or everyone) else? |
|
|