I spent about $5 per sentence in my resume using Fable 5.1 (High) to verify accuracy, inconsistency, and edit.

Opus 5.5 (med, as it's better than F5.1 high per graph in the article) used $2.2 and caught errors that Fable 5.1 missed.

Try Opus 5.5, cheaper, faster, and more intelligent for those prepping for interviews.

▲

copperx a day ago | parent [-]

$5 per sentence?

▲

yipinwong a day ago | parent [-]

I am sorry, I meant to say I generated STAR out of my resume line, trying to generate STAR, and polish it thus $5.

---

I provided crapton of context for that one resume line. All the work I did, documentations for my justifications, etc.

I initially messed up and came out ot $5, rest of resume used around $4 per line (I used a fresh new session on purpose).

---

As a clarification, $2.2 average for OPUS 5.5 was the same process in a new session, same context, same prompts.

Also adding verification for that Fable 5.1 output in the same sesssion.

▲

toasty228 a day ago | parent [-]

No wonder compute is tight when people burn millions of tokens to polish every single lines of their resume, all that work just for your resume to be injested by another claude clanker once you submit it, what a fucking time to be alive...

	▲	yipinwong a day ago \| parent [-]
		mind your own business