Is it? Personally I only found the story interesting because of the contents of the message, not because GPT-6 Math Scoopa was the one to stand on everyone else's shoulders and get its grubby little fingers into the cookie jar. Computer does thing that computers should ostensibly be good at is a middling goalpost – what's more intriguing is the implication that the model might have stolen private info or scooped someone else to get there once again.

▲

madaxe_again 20 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes! All science and research that relies on prior research is FAKE.

That’s why I’m trying to make a better shoelace but first I have to develop arithmetic and shoes.

	▲	anthonyrstevens 10 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		And atoms
	▲	nozzlegear 13 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		What I said: > Personally I only found the story interesting because of the contents of the message, not because GPT-6 Math Scoopa was the one to stand on everyone else's shoulders and get its grubby little fingers into the cookie jar. What you read: > All science and research that relies on prior research is FAKE. I'm not sure you'll have much success with your shoelaces given such poor reading comprehension, but good luck goofball.