I agree with this. I think the researchers who's harnessing the llm's power should be credited more than the model itself. We also need to understand the thought process and the prompts that are given to the model so we can learn and collab to ensure humanity's progress as much as the llm itself.

> I think the researchers who's harnessing the llm's power should be credited more than the model itself.

Even when the report literally says the LLM did it on its own?

Let's not over-correct in the direction of knowing better than the first party.

‘knowing what problems are worth solving —- priceless”.

For everything else, there’s Astracard

Why? Sounds like they played no role in solving it besides presenting the problem.