| ▲ | aleph_minus_one 3 hours ago | |||||||
> Everyone should be using zstd Why? | ||||||||
| ▲ | shawabawa3 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
It's just the best general purpose compression algorithm, in terms of compression ratio to CPU used, for the vast majority of use cases | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | xxs 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
It's just this good. On a more realistic note: few years back, I've added zstd compression to our log subsystem (hand written direct buffers, native code, in-process, java). For the same CPU utilization if provides twice dense compression compared to regular [-6] gzip (the topic in the title). Zstd is =much= faster on decompression as well, and it this case - unparalleledly better as it uses twice less disk. zstd is 'silicon valley' (the tv show) - life imitates fiction, except entirely open source | ||||||||